> It is because of a deep misconception, which, paradoxically, originated within my own field, theoretical physics. The misconception is that once you have spec

> It is because of a deep misconception, which, paradoxically, originated within my own field, theoretical physics. The misconception is that once you have specified everything that exists in the physical world and what happens to it—all the actual stuff—then you have explained everything that can be explained. If any scientist actually thinks this, then science is in deep trouble.