3 ms·
That wasn’t my argument. But well done on successfully arguing with yourself. Bravo. So if we “know” that USDT is a scam, and people are being deliberately mis
by onethought 5y ago
That wasn’t my argument. But well done on successfully arguing with yourself. Bravo.
So if we “know” that USDT is a scam, and people are being deliberately misled then we should define it as fraud, or come up with some kind of new regulation. (By your own logic).
So we agree.
- betwixthewires 5y agoBy my own logic we need no new regulation, we have what we need. If something is fraud prosecute it as fraud, which is already illegal.
- onethought 5y agoRight - so the OP originally stated that government should step in and protect its citizens. Which I agree with. USDT is fraud. Which is illegal, so you are agreeing. Just you interpreted what they said as “introduce new law” whereas I interpreted it much more literally as public prosecutors should be taking action.