> "all the nuclear energy output reduced in Germany has already been more than made up for with non-hydro renewables". Which means despite all the efforts and

> "all the nuclear energy output reduced in Germany has already been more than made up for with non-hydro renewables". Which means despite all the efforts and billions spent the renewables have helped zero in reducing carbon emissions, because they were used to replace nuclear rather than coal. > Nuclear usually requires vast subsidies to operate This is not true, notably unlike non-hydro renewables.