I have every confidence that the people picking contractors won't let a 10% stake owned by the federal government cloud their judgement. If the stake was owned

I have every confidence that the people picking contractors won't let a 10% stake owned by the federal government cloud their judgement. If the stake was owned by any of the relevant institutions then that might play a role, since it could contribute in some way to the institution's budget perhaps. But it's an interesting idea. If the government were to take a percentage in return for funding, there could be an explicit goal of getting out of the position with X times return in less than Y years. X might not have to be particularly large, the goal would only be to cover losses and inflation.