Any ideas how Microsoft wants to frame this so it becomes a partisan issue? Microsoft Legal can’t change the facts of the case, but presumably Microsoft PR want

Any ideas how Microsoft wants to frame this so it becomes a partisan issue? Microsoft Legal can’t change the facts of the case, but presumably Microsoft PR wants to shape the narrative into one agreeable to the conservative majority on the court. I have a feeling that regardless of the specifics, it will be a narrative where the little people lose and the big people get to keep playing. I would love to be proven wrong though. If I’m right, it’s a stark reminder that Microsoft need only sustain its open-source friendly, developer-empowering persona as long as it’s convenient and rational. When there’s territory at stake, that veneer of friendliness begins to crack.