3 ms·

This "information control" continues in present time. Remember a few months ago when an elected official lying was a big deal? Then K. Harris goes on tv last we

This "information control" continues in present time. Remember a few months ago when an elected official lying was a big deal? Then K. Harris goes on tv last week in a major network news interview and says "we've been to the border." (Kudos to Lester Holt for immediately calling her out). Where's the condemnation? Or consider the narrative around Hunter Biden's laptop. Mainstream news would have you think the "story" is that Russians are planting disinfo with Rudy Giuliani's help. Never mind the fact that there are photos of him smoking crack, discussions of business deals juicing in "the big guy", tax fraud investigations, and now, casually tossing around the n-word. NYT or MSNBC simply chooses not to report this information, despite reporting on the previous president's children at every possible opportunity.

chillwaves 5y ago
HN is not the place to post conspiracy nonsense.
- listenallyall 5y ago
  Thanks for proving my, and "foxfired" above's point. Anything inconvenient is simply not covered, and when it is brought up, labeled as a conspiracy theory. Actual truth is not determined, investigated, or reported, simply ignored. Instead, simply mentioning Kamala Harris's very clear statement on NBC has now become a conspiracy, according to "chillwaves"
  - chillwaves 5y ago
    Nothing of the sort happened, but I am sure you can take any reply and make it "prove your point". So this is the real reason why I said don't post conspiracy nonsense -- because frankly, no one cares. And it's annoying to sit here and reply with logic when you clearly do not care about the merit of whatever I have to say. No one covered those stories? Fox News is the number one rated cable news station. Tucker Carlson has the number one rated show on that number one station and he covered it for weeks on end before the election. So that point of yours is as ridiculous as it is baseless. Secondly, hello we live in the modern era. Post a blog if you care so much. If the story had merit, if you had evidence, then what is stopping you from making this huge scoop? There are definitely financial incentives to do so. The reason is because you, just like Tucker Carlson on Fox News, are full of shit. The difference between you and him is at least Tucker Carlson knows he is lying and at least he's getting paid to do so. I assume you are doing this for free.

chillwaves 5y ago

HN is not the place to post conspiracy nonsense.

listenallyall 5y ago
Thanks for proving my, and "foxfired" above's point. Anything inconvenient is simply not covered, and when it is brought up, labeled as a conspiracy theory. Actual truth is not determined, investigated, or reported, simply ignored. Instead, simply mentioning Kamala Harris's very clear statement on NBC has now become a conspiracy, according to "chillwaves"
- chillwaves 5y ago
  Nothing of the sort happened, but I am sure you can take any reply and make it "prove your point". So this is the real reason why I said don't post conspiracy nonsense -- because frankly, no one cares. And it's annoying to sit here and reply with logic when you clearly do not care about the merit of whatever I have to say. No one covered those stories? Fox News is the number one rated cable news station. Tucker Carlson has the number one rated show on that number one station and he covered it for weeks on end before the election. So that point of yours is as ridiculous as it is baseless. Secondly, hello we live in the modern era. Post a blog if you care so much. If the story had merit, if you had evidence, then what is stopping you from making this huge scoop? There are definitely financial incentives to do so. The reason is because you, just like Tucker Carlson on Fox News, are full of shit. The difference between you and him is at least Tucker Carlson knows he is lying and at least he's getting paid to do so. I assume you are doing this for free.