The issue isn't the content of the data. It's the context of the release. You're trying to threaten a slippery slope wherein all information needs to be state

The issue isn't the content of the data. It's the context of the release. You're trying to threaten a slippery slope wherein all information needs to be state sanctioned, but the definition of disinformation makes it clear that the only time information gains that moniker is when it's actively being spread to mislead for malicious purposes. Quite the contrary to your 'extreme' extrapolation, the term disinformation allows us to identify the use of malicious state-sponsored information warfare. It FIGHTS state sponsored narratives. It doesn't support it.