Or maybe he's just joking, period? The "paper" in question was apparently released on April 1.. He is, in fact, a trained mathematical physicist, with a PhD fr

Or maybe he's just joking, period? The "paper" in question was apparently released on April 1.. He is, in fact, a trained mathematical physicist, with a PhD from Harvard, no less. That doesn't make his theory right. But it does mean that the OP's selective quoting is somewhere between misleading and outright deceptive.