3 ms·
Might be more accurate to say that population has grown since living conditions have gotten better.
by beforeolives 5y ago
Might be more accurate to say that population has grown since living conditions have gotten better.
- chromaton 5y agoMaybe. Can you provide an example?
- PaulHoule 5y agoActually there is a "demographic transition" in which, midway through, people suddenly realize that they don't need so many farmers and they don't have room in the city for them. In Europe they fired the ovens for these people. In the Middle East and Africa they are still fighting that war.
- AnimalMuppet 5y agoThe Nazi death camps were because the cities didn't have room for the displaced farmers?!? That's certainly the most... um, "creatively original" historical revisionism I've read in a very long time.
- PaulHoule 5y agoBig picture yeah. In places like Poland to have status was to have land and vice versa so long as there was a solar economy; once people started burning coal and the economy became capital intensive yesterday’s aristocrats were nobodies and people who had previously been low-status doctors, business people and teachers (e.g. Jewish people) were on top. Naturally those aristocrats were not happy about it. This all happened in about one and half human lifetimes and the people involved "wanted their country back". If you look at Lenin vs. the Kulaks or Mao Zhedong vs. the world in both cases they realized their country was on the trailing edge of industrialization and decided they would beat down people in the country to accumulate capital and outgrow "the west". Hitler rode the fear of communism to power.