I sense that in a lot of these posts, "objective news source" = "they agree with me". No news source is "unbiased" as in "not guided by what the newspaper thin

I sense that in a lot of these posts, "objective news source" = "they agree with me". No news source is "unbiased" as in "not guided by what the newspaper things is valuable". It's a ridiculous notion. Even when full honesty is assumed (not sure why anyone would; all newspapers publish what they want you to think for all sorts of reasons), even putting aside external factors that constrain or compel what is said, there is a selection process informed by what is held as important. I am not dismissing the objectivity of value (no fact-value dichotomy in my world), but in practice, you will see a variation in what people hold that to be or want to hold that to be.