> As the author says, that can be fixed with a relicensing. But he cannot retroactively remove MIT license. Changing license will only affect newer versions af

> As the author says, that can be fixed with a relicensing. But he cannot retroactively remove MIT license. Changing license will only affect newer versions afterwards. > If the source owner has a polite request If this is your definition of polite so be it. I think it's quite unfriendly. Asked for a valid reason he basically says "because I want it". If he want's them to remove it even though they have the right to use it he should at least explain why (or not publish MIT in the first place). His only argument is that he will get support requests, but he could just ignore them...