3 ms·
In general, I agree with you, but in the case of Atlanta and Fulton county that narrative is in conflict with repeated poor management. Lots of cities have inco
by prepend 5y ago
In general, I agree with you, but in the case of Atlanta and Fulton county that narrative is in conflict with repeated poor management. Lots of cities have incorporated over the past 20 years and ended up with better services and lower taxes. Part of that is due to siphoning off funds that would help worse off, but most is just due to more efficient management.
I used to not support the idea of reforming Milton county, but it makes more sense as Fulton funds are focused on Atlanta and away from the tax base. Especially with stupid stuff like no Atlanta police chief for a year, etc. And no Marta in north Fulton. And minimal court services, etc.
I live also live in one of the (upper?) northern burbs of Atlanta. I had to handle some property tax stuff and it was kafkaesque in how out of touch and poorly managed it is. Driving an hour to downtown atlanta to meet with an assessor who has never been to my town. Then meeting with a board of “peers” that also don’t even know the town where I live, listen to my arguments, ask no questions and then rubber stamp the county.
I’m not sure how to fix this and it’s so appealing to just give up and work on local stuff.
- selimthegrim 5y agoDidn't Marta extensions get voted down by those same suburban counties?
- prepend 5y agoThis is all in the same county, Fulton, and the northern part has voted to extend multiple times. The current Marta line stops about 8 miles from the top of the county. Even other counties, Gwinnett and Cobb have recently voted to extend but that’s sort of a separate point. My complaint was that Fulton county sales taxes support Marta, but Marta service does not extend all the way through the county.