3 ms·

This should be trivially easy for proponents of that theory to prove it if that is in his emails. Just link to an un-edited, full context email thread relevant

by creato 5y ago

This should be trivially easy for proponents of that theory to prove it if that is in his emails. Just link to an un-edited, full context email thread relevant to that topic. So does this exist? If so, just share that link. If not, stop pretending that "media bias" is an excuse to continue sharing the claim surrounded by unfounded conspiracy thinking.

throwaway0a5e 5y ago
> full context email thread Nobody who is dumb enough to let such a thing come into existence in the first place winds up with a career arc that takes them through a position of substantial authority at the federal level. Politicians may be evil but they're not dumb.
Impassionata 5y ago
These people here in this topic are the vectors for misinformation.
NaturalPhallacy 5y ago
>Thanks for sharing. Yes, I saw this earlier today and both Eddie and myself are actually quoted in it. It's a great article, but the problem is that our phylogenetic analyses aren't able to answer whether the sequences are unusual at individual residues, except if they are completely off. On a phylogenetic tree the virus looks totally normal and the close clustering with bats suggest that bats serve as the reservoir. The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1 ) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered. >We have a good team lined up to look very critically at this, so we should know much more at the end of the weekend. I should mention that after discussions earlier today, Eddie, Bob, Mike, and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory. But we have to look at this much more closely and there are still further analyses to be done, so those opinions could still change Page 3187: https://www.scribd.com/document/510220252/Fauci-Emails#from_embed https://www.scribd.com/document/510220252/Fauci-Emails#from_... HN formatting is primitive, but the relevant sentence is "Eddie, Bob, Mike, and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory."
- myfavoritedog 5y ago
  Notice how when you present the facts, people get really quiet. No, "Wow, I checked out the source and you appear to be right. I'm going to have to re-think these issues." So much for intellectual integrity.
- bena 5y ago
  The other relevant sentences are the rest of them. Like "But we have to look at this much more closely and there are still further analyses to be done, so those opinions could still change" He basically, said "Eh, maybe, but we really need to look harder".

by creato 5y ago

throwaway0a5e 5y ago

> full context email thread Nobody who is dumb enough to let such a thing come into existence in the first place winds up with a career arc that takes them through a position of substantial authority at the federal level. Politicians may be evil but they're not dumb.

Impassionata 5y ago

These people here in this topic are the vectors for misinformation.

NaturalPhallacy 5y ago

>Thanks for sharing. Yes, I saw this earlier today and both Eddie and myself are actually quoted in it. It's a great article, but the problem is that our phylogenetic analyses aren't able to answer whether the sequences are unusual at individual residues, except if they are completely off. On a phylogenetic tree the virus looks totally normal and the close clustering with bats suggest that bats serve as the reservoir. The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1 ) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered. >We have a good team lined up to look very critically at this, so we should know much more at the end of the weekend. I should mention that after discussions earlier today, Eddie, Bob, Mike, and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory. But we have to look at this much more closely and there are still further analyses to be done, so those opinions could still change Page 3187: https://www.scribd.com/document/510220252/Fauci-Emails#from_embed https://www.scribd.com/document/510220252/Fauci-Emails#from_... HN formatting is primitive, but the relevant sentence is "Eddie, Bob, Mike, and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory."

myfavoritedog 5y ago
Notice how when you present the facts, people get really quiet. No, "Wow, I checked out the source and you appear to be right. I'm going to have to re-think these issues." So much for intellectual integrity.
bena 5y ago
The other relevant sentences are the rest of them. Like "But we have to look at this much more closely and there are still further analyses to be done, so those opinions could still change" He basically, said "Eh, maybe, but we really need to look harder".