3 ms·
The usability is going to be there. People will use centralized stuff like Paypal and Venmo and then move to handling their own stuff. Metamask was just copyin
by randomopining 5y ago
The usability is going to be there. People will use centralized stuff like Paypal and Venmo and then move to handling their own stuff.
Metamask was just copying some addresses and stuff. I realize that the average person can't even come close to doing it yet, but soon it'll be all QR scanning and stuff and they can prob do it.
- iamben 5y agoI don't disagree this is the direction we're moving in, but what need is there to move to handling your own stuff? If I spoke to 99% of my non tech friends - who (thanks to things like the NHS Covid Check In app) now get QR codes - I don't think any would feel the need to avoid using Stirling and a bank? (Edit: particularly when contactless/phone/watch payment is so ubiquitous in the UK)
- randomopining 5y agoTbh for the average person, I agree. Actually I think they benefit from centralized powers that can reverse fraud, etc. But the narrative is enticing: "Control YOUR money/value!"
- iamben 5y agoHaha, yes, with you totally! Perhaps it's a little like the Linux vs Windows/macOS/iOS/Android thing - "have complete control of your computer! Prevent people from spying on you! Tinker under the hood!" - and yet most of us are content with changing the background picture and happy if we don't get malware. I wonder if cryptocurrency is doomed to the same fate. If we take away the speculation and get rich quick - for the average person, what's left? If it won't make me rich (and there's a risk it'll make me poor!), why move from what I already have that works (arguably) far better?
- pavlov 5y ago> "The usability is going to be there." This was also the refrain in 2017. Billions were raised to make it happen. Four years later, what does the cryptocurrency industry have to show? Mass market adoption seems as unlikely as ever. QR codes don't solve anything when the basic design is so user-hostile — for the end user, crypto is unsafe money that you can lose at any time even if you think you're taking precautions. The only reasonable solutions available are centralized, and at that point you're competing against Apple, Google, Visa, etc.
- randomopining 5y agoYeah I agree to a point. I think the narrative of "You control YOUR money!" is enticing to a good amount of people. Overall for the average person with low liquid assets, having it in a bank makes way more sense for fraud protection etc. I think the average people will use Paypal/Venmo as a novelty and also to get the volatile investment gains. Then the individualists will hold theirs cold storage.
- G3rn0ti 5y agoWallets got better and are more standardized (private seed generation according to BIP-39, for example). DeFi DApps have happened in the past four years allowing you to easily invest and spent your cryptos from your browser. Stable coins and lending protocols have happened enabling you to earn interest on your dollars without exposing yourself to Bitcoin‘s volatility. Decentralized exchanges happened allowing you to swap between coins without the need for a centralized exchange in that case. Major wallets integrate many of these features allowing you to manage cryptos from your smartphone. Progress happened you’re just not looking for it.