The devil is always in the details and the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Only in retrospect can you verify the "great" part in great idea. Until t

The devil is always in the details and the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Only in retrospect can you verify the "great" part in great idea. Until then you only really have an deviant idea which could be: - taking a fence down without knowing why it was put up - CV driven development - is/ought problem - the French revolution :) Opposition to change is not a bad thing, if isn't extreme (we're not changing anything for any reason no matter what). It forces change to justify itself and its costs, because there are always costs. Personally I hate these kind of articles. They take a few survivor examples and extrapolate that X is good, -X is bad. In reality you can only move the cursor a little on the (-X, X) axis and observe the outcomes after a relatively long term.