5 ms·
I dunno what happened with Seveneves but its one of few books I decided not to finish. There are some books you get bored with or forget to finish, but this one
by me_me_me 5y ago
I dunno what happened with Seveneves but its one of few books I decided not to finish. There are some books you get bored with or forget to finish, but this one made me drop it.
I have stopped reading Seveneves at the end of second act/part.
It has very interesting premises and nice world building. Stephenson throws all the right ingredients into a pot for an amazing story. Mass social pressures, countries at bring of wars but forced to work together, though choices to be made and there are not enough resources to save everyone...
...but the plots and characters are so poorly written that it actively took me out of the experience.
Most of the characters in the book are just 1 dimensional flags - driven by a singular purpose. They make such poor emotional decisions that the survival of the species depends on. And its not a random survivor 1803, its the leadership of the remaining humanity. Its almost comical when we get detail descriptions of the tech, and the space-station inner-workings, but the social fabric of it is paper thin and bland.
But the last nail in the coffin was the end of part two: the decision on the future of humanity decided via blackmail - do it my way or I'll blow us all up - what?!
If there was a handful of us and one person blackmail everyone to do something stupid ('because I want it this way - no debate, no pros and cons), I would agree to their demands and after they let go of the trigger I would bash their head in. The whole ethics goes out of the window when one crazy person can doom whole humanity concentrated in one place...
This could have been a great book, ends up being meh.
4/10 great setting, terrible plot
- Santosh83 5y ago> Most of the characters in the book are just 1 dimensional flags - driven by a singular purpose. They make such poor emotional decisions that the survival of the species depends on. And its not a random survivor 1803, its the leadership of the remaining humanity. Its almost comical when we get detail descriptions of the tech, and the space-station inner-workings, but the social fabric of it is paper thin and bland. Wow how similar to the real world we have!
- dogma1138 5y agoThe only novel I’ve read (didn’t finish) by Neal was Anathem and besides being a 1000 page drag it used the literary fiction tool I hate the most taking (English) words and changing a letter or two or creating onomatopoeic twins with different spelling e.g. avout (devout) and sæcular (secular) it just super lazy and disrespectful to the reader if you want to have a society of monks that took a vow of some sort just call them that. I care about the plot and the setting not the names of things, I really fucking hate authors who try to be original by bastardizing words for no reason. If this was some post apocalyptic society and how the spelling and pronunciation and even the meaning of the words evolved over time is part of the story then sure go a head but when it’s completely detached from the setting it’s just just is lazy writing.
- bawolff 5y agoNormally i hate that sort of thing, but i thought it worked perfectly well for that novel and it wouldn't of accomplished its goals if he didnt do that.