> There are lots of things people like to do that use a lot of energy that I think are stupid. (...) I don't understand what argument you tried to make. Other

> There are lots of things people like to do that use a lot of energy that I think are stupid. (...) I don't understand what argument you tried to make. Other than a far fetched attempt at whattaboutism... Is bitcoin's astronomical power drain ok because some hypothetical person might drive a big car or goods are shipped with trucks? That does not follow. I mean, aren't there alternatives to bitcoin that have far lower energy needs? Why stick with absurd non-sequiturs to insist that bitcoin's astronomical power drain is somehow ok?