I’m struggling a bit with the layout of the arguments in this article. In particular, it seems to conflate several related, but different things. - Face/voice

I’m struggling a bit with the layout of the arguments in this article. In particular, it seems to conflate several related, but different things. - Face/voice recognition, which is just statistical modeling and threshold testing at the end of the day. - (Mis)use of face/voice recognition to test for things that these technologies aren’t going to accurately measure - Equating the former to phrenology, when it’s a more accurate of an analogy to equate the latter to phrenology. Overall, I agree with the basic premise that face/voice recognition being misused to apply prejudice is a valid concern.