5 ms·

From his comment history, search for Pakistan. It's a flagged post. He is openly racist and hates Muslims. "Muslims have always been the perpetrators of unwarra

From his comment history, search for Pakistan. It's a flagged post. He is openly racist and hates Muslims. "Muslims have always been the perpetrators of unwarranted violence," This is why he votes for modi. https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=naruvimama https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=naruvimama Development of gujarat under modi is a fig leaf for the underlying reason for voting for modi. The motivations are right wing religious ethno fascism. The others in this case are muslims, with Christians and Sikhs being discriminated on a more opportunistic basis. Their vote for modi is in the hopes of building a hindu religious ethno state along Nazi principles with the muslims playing the role of German Jews. This idea is being heavily propagandize through social media, primarily WhatsApps encrypted channels. The religious frenzy being built up in the country is absolutely unreal. Well educated software engineers have also been completely absorbed into this fold, as you can observe from the comments.

naruvimama 5y ago
> He is openly racist and hates Muslims Indian Muslims are the same race as Hindus. I distrust Islam just like the vast majority of the world. Muslims are victims of Islam, especially Indian Muslims because it was never their choice. There isn't a single muslim country to the west of India that has any minority rights. An overwhelming 87% of Indian Muslim voted for the Muslim league and hence the creation of Pakistan. That is political Islam and it has killed millions of Hindus in the past 70 years. One big problem with Muslims is that they always think of themselves as victims but seem to have no remorse for the millions of kafirs they have killed. I do not want India to turn into a Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq or Syria. > Muslims have always been the perpetrators of unwarranted violence That was in response to your mention of Gujarat. The whole incident started when Muslim mobs burnt alive 59 Hindu pilgrims including children. Clearly they had planned for violence and were sufficiently armed. This has always been the case with Muslims around the world. Start the violence and cry victim.
- random314 5y ago
  I like how you have stated your beliefs simply and clearly. Let's not pretend that your vote for modi is based on some car factory. Also, for your future reference. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_secularism#Secular_states_with_majority_Muslim_populations https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_secularism#Secular...
  - naruvimama 5y ago
    Funny you say that, most of them are namesake secular. Filter out countries that have had large scale ethnic cleansing or genocide in the last 70 years. Filter out those countries which have 99% muslims. Filter out those which do not have some form of sharia imposed. Even though both muslims and Hindus in India want a better future for themselves and their children. Muslims have shown their willingness to engage in arson, destruction of public property and stopping economic activity or progress to push their own Islamic politics at every opportunity. You must be really blind to not have observed this.
    - random314 5y ago
      BJP is pushing for a Hindu ethno-fascist state. Are you citing Islamic states as a form of what-aboutism or as a template for inspiration? Also, for your laundry list of objections that you created with zero research - here is Albania https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secularism_in_Albania#Debates_about_secularism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secularism_in_Albania#Debates_... There are more, but I will let you do the research. Maybe you will find an example in a secular muslim majority state where the prime minister hand picks a terrorist under trial (whose phone and vehicle were used to bomb a church/temple) as a candidate for election.
      - zozbot234 5y ago
        > BJP is pushing for a Hindu ethno-fascist state The relevant word there is obviously "Hindu", but the Permit Raj system in India is more than 70 years old. Is there really a national alternative to the BJP that's less authoritarian/corporatist/fascist and more freedom oriented, in a way that would meaningfully benefit the average Indian?
        random314 5y ago
        Virtually any party would be less authoritarian and fascist. Manmohan Singh was the last prime minister. The average Indian would benefit from a better economy, employment opportunities, fearlessness from cow and other vigilantes, sedition charges for expressing political opinions. Muslims in kashmir, lakshwadeep and Sikhs would feel safer. BJP losing would boost national pride. Right now Indians are considered a joke. I have been personally asked to go drink cow piss on various forums. Plastering cow dung all over the body and ridiculous statements about gold in cow milk will be stripped from text books. Money invested in ayush ministry and central vista will be used in health spending. https://www.reddit.com/r/shitbjpsays/ https://www.reddit.com/r/shitbjpsays/

naruvimama 5y ago

> He is openly racist and hates Muslims Indian Muslims are the same race as Hindus. I distrust Islam just like the vast majority of the world. Muslims are victims of Islam, especially Indian Muslims because it was never their choice. There isn't a single muslim country to the west of India that has any minority rights. An overwhelming 87% of Indian Muslim voted for the Muslim league and hence the creation of Pakistan. That is political Islam and it has killed millions of Hindus in the past 70 years. One big problem with Muslims is that they always think of themselves as victims but seem to have no remorse for the millions of kafirs they have killed. I do not want India to turn into a Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq or Syria. > Muslims have always been the perpetrators of unwarranted violence That was in response to your mention of Gujarat. The whole incident started when Muslim mobs burnt alive 59 Hindu pilgrims including children. Clearly they had planned for violence and were sufficiently armed. This has always been the case with Muslims around the world. Start the violence and cry victim.

random314 5y ago
I like how you have stated your beliefs simply and clearly. Let's not pretend that your vote for modi is based on some car factory. Also, for your future reference. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_secularism#Secular_states_with_majority_Muslim_populations https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_secularism#Secular...
- naruvimama 5y ago
  Funny you say that, most of them are namesake secular. Filter out countries that have had large scale ethnic cleansing or genocide in the last 70 years. Filter out those countries which have 99% muslims. Filter out those which do not have some form of sharia imposed. Even though both muslims and Hindus in India want a better future for themselves and their children. Muslims have shown their willingness to engage in arson, destruction of public property and stopping economic activity or progress to push their own Islamic politics at every opportunity. You must be really blind to not have observed this.
  - random314 5y ago
    BJP is pushing for a Hindu ethno-fascist state. Are you citing Islamic states as a form of what-aboutism or as a template for inspiration? Also, for your laundry list of objections that you created with zero research - here is Albania https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secularism_in_Albania#Debates_about_secularism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secularism_in_Albania#Debates_... There are more, but I will let you do the research. Maybe you will find an example in a secular muslim majority state where the prime minister hand picks a terrorist under trial (whose phone and vehicle were used to bomb a church/temple) as a candidate for election.
    - zozbot234 5y ago
      > BJP is pushing for a Hindu ethno-fascist state The relevant word there is obviously "Hindu", but the Permit Raj system in India is more than 70 years old. Is there really a national alternative to the BJP that's less authoritarian/corporatist/fascist and more freedom oriented, in a way that would meaningfully benefit the average Indian?
      - random314 5y ago
        Virtually any party would be less authoritarian and fascist. Manmohan Singh was the last prime minister. The average Indian would benefit from a better economy, employment opportunities, fearlessness from cow and other vigilantes, sedition charges for expressing political opinions. Muslims in kashmir, lakshwadeep and Sikhs would feel safer. BJP losing would boost national pride. Right now Indians are considered a joke. I have been personally asked to go drink cow piss on various forums. Plastering cow dung all over the body and ridiculous statements about gold in cow milk will be stripped from text books. Money invested in ayush ministry and central vista will be used in health spending. https://www.reddit.com/r/shitbjpsays/ https://www.reddit.com/r/shitbjpsays/