4 ms·
Warrant canaries are unreliable. Apple, for example, stopped issuing warrant canaries in Sept. 2014 [1], but was added to the NSA's PRISM program almost 2 years
by xvector 5y ago
Warrant canaries are unreliable. Apple, for example, stopped issuing warrant canaries in Sept. 2014 [1], but was added to the NSA's PRISM program almost 2 years earlier, in Oct. 2012 [2].
But I suppose a warrant canary by nature requires companies to be honest. There's not much you can do if the company is being deceptive with a vaguely phrased canary.
[1]: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/09/no-apple-probably-didnt-get-new-secret-govt-orders-to-hand-over-data https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/09/no-apple-probabl...
[2]: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/06/new-leak-feds-can-access-anything-in-your-google-facebook-and-more/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/06/new-leak-feds-ca...
- rsync 5y agoI have it on good authority that this one will continue...
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- moonchild 5y agoWhat will you do if the government coerces you into falsely renewing your warrant canary?
- axiosgunnar 5y agoI believe his defense against this is having three locations around the world that all need sign off for a canary to be published. So there is no „the government“.
- MikeUt 5y agoAt least we would eventually learn that the government can do that, and fight it in court.