4 ms·
It's possible that the rank-and-file will only follow leaders who have been granted outsize status. That way, executive compensation would need to be high even
by neutronicus 5y ago
It's possible that the rank-and-file will only follow leaders who have been granted outsize status.
That way, executive compensation would need to be high even if value over replacement executive is low.
- kibwen 5y agoMaybe in the absence of any direct incentive, but employees do have a direct incentive: their own salary. What seems more likely to boost employee morale, an executive choosing to pay himself more, or an executive choosing to pay his employees more?
- netizen-936824 5y agoI'd prefer to let my bosses trickle down all over my face. That's the american way.
- engineeringwoke 5y agoSocial hierarchies have their downsides, but if history is a guide, they are necessary. Any behavior that appears in all recorded cultures is likely to be a core survival advantage, and therefore very fundamental to us as humans operationally and unlikely to change.
- throwaway894345 5y agoThe arc of human history, especially in the west, has bent toward equality. I think some hierarchy is necessary, but I like how one of the previous comment distinguishes between organizational hierarchies and social (status) hierarchies. I’m not sure the latter are useful at all.
- engineeringwoke 5y agoHow are organizational hierarchies and social (status) hierarchies not the same thing? I'm not sure I'm following
- throwaway894345 5y agoAn organizational hierarchy is your reporting structure, e.g,. your boss telling you what to work on. A social status hierarchy is about how society esteems you, i.e., your social capital.