4 ms·
I’m don’t remember Usenet being federated so much as based on replication. It was really organized around large centers with many users at each center, and the
by projektfu 5y ago
I’m don’t remember Usenet being federated so much as based on replication. It was really organized around large centers with many users at each center, and the need to store and forward everything faithfully.
- mananaysiempre 5y agoI’m ready to defer to your expertise (or any expertise, really), but aren’t we just disagreeing over terminology? By a “federated system” I mean that there is a relatively small number of independently operated first-class entities (servers, nodes) that are more permanently connected and host a large number of second-class entities (users, points) that are more intermittently connected and generally correspond to individuals. Internet mail, IRC, Jabber and Matrix are federated; Slack (centralized) and BitTorrent with DHT (peer-to-peer) are not. The Internet itself is complex enough that it probably doesn’t usefully fit into this classification. In this sense Usenet and FidoNet are both federated store-and-forward mail systems. Or am I wrong?