3 ms·
Regulate ISPs because they have an actual monopoly? Nope, that's socialism Regulate "Big Tech" because they banned inciting violence on their platforms? Absolu
by wnevets 5y ago
Regulate ISPs because they have an actual monopoly? Nope, that's socialism
Regulate "Big Tech" because they banned inciting violence on their platforms? Absolutely, that's freedom.
- tristan957 5y agoStrawman arguments like this are entirely pointless, especially on HN. Please refrain from making them because it's obvious you aren't interested in real conversation.
- wnevets 5y agoOh I'm sorry, I didn't realize you were the official HN arbitrator on what is pointless or not.
- Thorncorona 5y agoRegardless, you're being needlessly antagonistic.
- wnevets 5y agoHow so? Ken Buck is against regulating ISPs. My comment wasn't a strawman, its literally his position. > When asked about Pai’s work to unravel net neutrality rules, Buck said: “I support Chairman Pai’s efforts to free internet providers from burdensome regulations that stifle innovation and increase costs for Coloradans.” [1] > The Far Left is attempting to enact their socialist agenda by tearing down statues and rewriting America’s history. > The United States of America will never be a socialist country—and we need to celebrate the Founders who made our nation so great. [2] [1] https://www.denverpost.com/2017/12/14/colorado-congress-net-neutrality/ https://www.denverpost.com/2017/12/14/colorado-congress-net-... [2] https://twitter.com/RepKenBuck/status/1301540179208007681 https://twitter.com/RepKenBuck/status/1301540179208007681