> it also implies a huge problem for the US to fulfill the Paris goal. There is simply no political consensus in the US to fulfill these goals, so it's not rea

> it also implies a huge problem for the US to fulfill the Paris goal. There is simply no political consensus in the US to fulfill these goals, so it's not really a problem at all for most people. It's been strange how many people just assume that the climate debate is over and that they have convinced the population that serious efforts must be made. Then when this stuff is put to a vote, they are always shocked that people remain unconvinced. That usually results in some sort of tantrum being thrown about the world ending and how humanity will suffer untold grief, when most of the population remains unconvinced and is not willing to spend more than a dollar or so a month on this project. Of course the US isn't going to be carbon neutral by 2050. No country will. That is not even on the table for discussion as there is no support for that type of radical change.