"They voted against the costs. " First, it's hard to know that and second, meeting Paris Accord targets will have 'costs'. So if you're voting against costs ne

"They voted against the costs. " First, it's hard to know that and second, meeting Paris Accord targets will have 'costs'. So if you're voting against costs necessary to meet a specified objective, well it's effectively the same thing as meeting the objective. After all, it's almost always about money. The editorial framing is fair.