4 ms·
Just my 0.02: True, Microsoft has always had extensive documentation. However, during the Ballmer era, there was tremendous version confusion. It was no longe
by reactspa 5y ago
Just my 0.02:
True, Microsoft has always had extensive documentation.
However, during the Ballmer era, there was tremendous version confusion. It was no longer clear which version of software a lot of documentation referred to.
I've noticed a huge clean-up in this regard after Satya took over. I suspect he got some very competent person to take over all the public-facing documentation, to make it more user-friendly.
The result: I am willing to trust Microsoft documentation again.