3 ms·

The Article seems to be from January.

• Grim-444 5y ago
  What are you implying, that science published five months ago is invalid?
  • bijant 5y ago
    Not at all. But since the time this was published many people have been vaccinated and we have a lot of data that the researchers didn’t have at the time of publication. The Speculation in the article, while totally valid at the time, should be replaced by a comprehensive analysis of the available data.
    • AndrewBissell 5y ago
      I would think the recent concerns around myocarditis indicate there may be some reason to take the article's speculation about potential cardiac effects seriously.
    • T-A 5y ago
      The pulmonary hypertension they worry about is hard to detect and takes a few years to kill you. A few months may not be enough for it to have become noticeable.