He wrote a blog post about a language and tools that he doesn't personally use or understand that he was trying to use to stress test his system. From reading t

He wrote a blog post about a language and tools that he doesn't personally use or understand that he was trying to use to stress test his system. From reading the responses it seems that he may have misunderstood Firefox specific issues as being rust issues by virtue of having insufficient understanding to disambiguate. Had he communicated he probably would have been able to derive this understanding easier from conversation thus the exhortation that he ought to have do so sees to be productive and correct. I don't think its apt to call the people critiquing the critique "apologists" when the entire original blog post seems to be misunderstanding on the part of the blogger. Posts that critique things the poster do not understand tend to themselves generate critical feedback which seems fairly measured to me.