5 ms·
Efficiency is for robots. I deliver value to my company on a continuous basis and if taking a nap in the afternoon means I work an hour or two in the evening t
by wavefunction 5y ago
Efficiency is for robots. I deliver value to my company on a continuous basis and if taking a nap in the afternoon means I work an hour or two in the evening then I don't see what worries The Economist should hold about the situation.
- HarryHirsch 5y agoI don't see what worries The Economist should hold about the situation The readership of the Economist is worried about commercial real estate.
- alchemism 5y agoThat is my takeaway also - the editorial staff at The Economist must have friends in commercial real estate.
- nerevarthelame 5y agoIt's convenient that Economist articles don't show bylines. They claim that it's because they want to speak with a collective voice, but it also makes it impossible to point out specific conflicts of interest. The latter seems more important than the former, in my eyes.
- chrisseaton 5y ago> I deliver value to my company on a continuous basis and if taking a nap in the afternoon means I work an hour or two in the evening But this sounds efficient.