3 ms·
I don’t know where this urge to whitewash Nero is coming from but it’s worth noting that the stories of child sacrifice in Carthage were widely considered propa
by camjohnson26 5y ago
I don’t know where this urge to whitewash Nero is coming from but it’s worth noting that the stories of child sacrifice in Carthage were widely considered propaganda until archeologists uncovered evidence of it. It’s impossible that any historical source avoids all bias, but incredibly cruel things happened in the past and it’s a mistake to discount it all just because the source shows bias. I hope 2000 years from now people don’t claim the Holocaust was just western propaganda from the victors of the war and make Hitler out to be a hero.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/jan/21/carthaginians-sacrificed-own-children-study https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/jan/21/carthaginian...
- rsynnott 5y agoI don't think it's an urge to whitewash, really, as much as a general tendency in modern (post-19th century) history to not blindly accept accounts written after the fact, especially where the sources are known to be unreliable, but rather to try and figure out what happened. Obviously Nero was a very nasty piece of work, but then most Roman emperors _were_. Nero's public image is essentially cartoonishly evil; it's probably not really justified.