4 ms·
> Poor people will be tested after animal testing so it is not that worst. > Animal testing is unnecessary most of the time. Even when its necessary they are b
by joshuaissac 5y ago
> Poor people will be tested after animal testing so it is not that worst.
> Animal testing is unnecessary most of the time. Even when its necessary they are brutally tortured
If animal testing involves brutally torturing the test subjects, then surely it would be much worse for poor human test subjects if they are swapped in, compared to what they go through now. Those steps that involve torturous pain would have to happen with the human subjects instead of the animals.