I don't know which bit you're referring to. If it's the hard problem, then no, we haven't cracked it, and redefining the question to try to ignore it doesn't wo

I don't know which bit you're referring to. If it's the hard problem, then no, we haven't cracked it, and redefining the question to try to ignore it doesn't work. This approach typically comes from enthusiastic scientists (biologists in particular seem to be common) rather than actual philosophers, and often the premises were discussed and dismissed hundreds of years ago. If it's the claim that you can't explain the universe with logic, then we're perilously close to things like Tarski's Undefinability Theorem, and that has me convinced.