The article gives a lot of examples of cruel, useless or ineffectual animal testing but does not address useful or critical animal testing at all. They are sim

The article gives a lot of examples of cruel, useless or ineffectual animal testing but does not address useful or critical animal testing at all. They are simply implying all animal testing is in the former category. > The quality of discourse on HN goes up when we all meaningfully engage with the content. The goal shouldn't be to see who is fastest to post a dismissal of the headline. The same could be said about comments.