7 ms·
The blog post can be read as advocating self-censorship by Youtube. Or, more accurately, even more self-censorship by Youtube than they are already doing. Where
by Centrino 5y ago
The blog post can be read as advocating self-censorship by Youtube. Or, more accurately, even more self-censorship by Youtube than they are already doing.
Where did you read that they recommend state censorship, i.e. speech restriction by law?
- smsm42 5y ago"So what do we do about all this? /.../ Additionally, Chaslot recommends regulators step in and issue laws that begin to curb this."
- uniqueid 5y agoThat does clearly imply that Mozilla recommends it too, but the phrasing the article uses (ie: 'Additionally, Chaslot recommends') is noncommittal. The impression the full article gives me is that its purpose is to raise awareness that the Youtube recommendation algorithm is manipulative. When I read the title here on HN I thought it meant that Mozilla was demanding the US government force Youtube to scrap the recommendations feature entirely.