3 ms·
Now this is what I'm much more interested in. Security of the code is a off-the-charts more important than what the package happens to be called. ;) Thanks for
by Quarrelsome 15y ago
Now this is what I'm much more interested in. Security of the code is a off-the-charts more important than what the package happens to be called. ;)
Thanks for the insight. The article suggests the author is upset due to controversy due to the name but I assume her anguish is more due to the forking of the library and what she feels is the removal of her credit?
- tptacek 15y agoNo; Github gave her credit immediately on starting the project. She was irritated that they chose to fork her code at all, and disapproved of many of the changes. But her code, as Github found it, was absolutely not safe to run on a popular public web app.
- Quarrelsome 15y agoThis is so much more of a better story than the OP. Thanks for filling in the gaps, much appreciated.
- grncdr 15y agoHaving submitted the OP, I completely agree. You never know where an informative tptacek post will show up... :)