4 ms·
I opened the link and I saw the organisation hosting it is the same one associated with the interviewed person, which is the owner of the URL as well. That sou
by guiraldelli 5y ago
I opened the link and I saw the organisation hosting it is the same one associated with the interviewed person, which is the owner of the URL as well.
That sounds too… Suspicious. Thus, I decided to search the internet for the interviewed person, and first link is the "colourful" Wikipedia entry [1].
Judge it for yourself, but I am disappointed to see this kind of links in here. Luckily, it is already flagged.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Kory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Kory
- krrrh 5y agoThe organization that he is part of isn’t hosting the video but embedding the video which was on Bret Weinstein’s podcast. What is colourful about the Wikipedia entry exactly? He appears to be a credible physician who has a different opinion on what early data is showing on treatments that hasn’t gotten a lot of attention. The interview is interesting and addresses these controversies. This looks like part of the scientific process to me and it would be good to allow people to make counter arguments rather than dismissing anyone with a different opinion.
- briefcomment 5y agoThe only thing "colorful" about his entry is that he dissents from the Government and Media's stance on Covid treatment, which is not an issue in itself, but can only be determined as such if you evaluate the evidence. The flagged video is him providing some of that evidence. It seems like you're jumping the gun here if you condemn him without evaluating his evidence.