> It’s hard to take seriously an article that purports to teach about moral decision-making and doesn’t reference any kind of utility theory Can you clarify th

> It’s hard to take seriously an article that purports to teach about moral decision-making and doesn’t reference any kind of utility theory Can you clarify this a little? Utility is helpful, I would think, but there are cases in which utility isn't a reliable indicator. (For example, the utility of running into a burning building to save a stranger; or the utility of telling the truth when a lie would serve better.)