13 ms·
No it didn’t. First - a driver was required in the vehicle meaning they either had to break laws around driving shifts or use 2 drivers - which you can already
by Traster 5y ago
No it didn’t. First - a driver was required in the vehicle meaning they either had to break laws around driving shifts or use 2 drivers - which you can already do. Second - the driver had to drive both the start and end of the journey. This is like when your child learns to ride a bike and you’re actually just running along behind keeping them up- the difference being with the kid if you let go and they crash it’s not a big deal.
There’s nothing about this technology that enables what they’re claiming, it’s basically a demo other companies could have done 5+ years ago.