I agree that for example in Germany, it would be very helpful to limit the chancellor(...ship?) to two terms. But again, just because social security does not

I agree that for example in Germany, it would be very helpful to limit the chancellor(...ship?) to two terms. But again, just because social security does not deliver all it promises - throw it out completely? I don't get that point. Tendencies that exist right now can be corrected. And that wouldn't even be more expensive, but at least in Germany, the money would just have to be distributed more fairly. For example, you get the same amount of child benefits no matter what you earn. That doesn't make sense. So change that a little and lots of people won't notice while lots of people will do way better.