4 ms·
The first thing that comes to mind after reading this article is that they don't have enough evidence to conclude that the fact that there were sperm in the vic
by liquidify 5y ago
The first thing that comes to mind after reading this article is that they don't have enough evidence to conclude that the fact that there were sperm in the victim that weren't from her boyfriend actually means that they were murdered by the creator of said sperm.
It seems likely, but calling the case 'solved' just based on that is a bit of a stretch to me. Maybe the article is leaving out some important details.
- thaumasiotes 5y agoCome on, we all know that any woman who cheats on her boyfriend is immediately murdered by the same guy she cheated with.
- vmception 5y agoJust like we know that the spouse that has a life insurance policy opened on them is immediately murdered by the surviving spouse, instead of the life insurance agent We don't! We just assume!
- geoduck14 5y agoI watch a lot of Forensic Files, and one of the tropes is "the spouse had a $30k life insurance policy, therefore he/she had motive". I've always wondered who is motivated to murder by as little as $30k. Sure you can murder for NON financial reasons, but if money is top of mind - $30k, really?