5 ms·
This was removed from YouTube after having been up for a week and a half [1] Also, this is nowhere on HN, after being on the front page a couple minutes ago.
by briefcomment 5y ago
This was removed from YouTube after having been up for a week and a half [1]
Also, this is nowhere on HN, after being on the front page a couple minutes ago. Wonder why.
[1]https://twitter.com/BretWeinstein/status/1403561674792075264 https://twitter.com/BretWeinstein/status/1403561674792075264
- dang 5y agoUsers flagged it. It's common for stories to make the front page and then get flagged. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html
- briefcomment 5y agoGot it, the title didn't say [flagged] when I posted my comment. Looks like it's still flagged. Does it not pass some criteria to be un-flagged?
- dang 5y agoWe sometimes turn off flags, but only if the story is likely to support a substantive discussion on HN. I unfortunately can't imagine that happening here. I think it would be a bigass flamewar, for the same reason that it attracted a lot of flags in the first place.
- krrrh 5y agoI watched the video when it was released on Bret Weinstein’s podcast. I think it could be an interesting discussion if people actually watched the video, but this seems like a touchy subject to people who didn’t for some reason.
- dang 5y agoI don't think it's so much about whether people watch the video or not—that's too optimistic. People will respond based on pre-existing affiliations. A drawback of being a large, open, flat community is that discussions break down when there's, say, an 80/20 split or worse in the community. When it's 90/10 or 99/1, nothing is really possible. You'd need a smaller, more cohesive forum for that.