3 ms·
I think we can agree that the author is genuinely interested in the problem. Personally, it’s exhausting to hear what I believe are the same people ask web deve
by throwaway284534 5y ago
I think we can agree that the author is genuinely interested in the problem. Personally, it’s exhausting to hear what I believe are the same people ask web developers to build with competing constraints at the same time. A good website must be…
- Renderable to both modern and older browsers
- Designed for mobile and desktop screens
- Accessible to those with disabilities
- Supporting some level of offline web app use, ideally avoiding a platform specific App Store
There’s all of that and more, but it’s not is impossible. In fact, requirements like accessibility are often mandated by law. But if I was building a new product, I’d honestly prefer a smaller set of JS friendly customers that I can serve a great experience to, and go from there. Progressive enhancement usually runs opposite to this issue. It’s very time consuming and adds an additional platform complexity to your existing technical product problems.
- throw0101a 5y ago> Renderable to both modern and older browsers If I disable JS and/or cookies, I should be able to read the content the web page. Just send over the HTML and CSS and let the web browser do its thing. If I get a blank page when either/both are disabled, but I do a 'view source' and get pages and pages of stuff, IMHO you're doing something wrong. It doesn't have to have all the functionality, just please have some text be thrown onto my screen.