3 ms·
It's better to adopt filtering instead of reducing your sample rate, only if the opportunity cost of sampling and processing is sufficiently cheap (given scenar
by icegreentea2 5y ago
It's better to adopt filtering instead of reducing your sample rate, only if the opportunity cost of sampling and processing is sufficiently cheap (given scenario). If it's relatively expensive to sample and process (which I think apply to many business type scenarios),, just decreasing your sampling rate to more appropriately match your ability to manipulate outcomes make sense.
- lanstin 5y agoThe old destructive vs non destructive testing idea. We measured the screw but we destroyed the screw. It had good quality. Now, how many screws do we need to sacrifice to be on top of our quality?