3 ms·
Why wouldn't they be? Just because people read dumb things doesn't mean they are dumb themselves.
by pests 5y ago
Why wouldn't they be? Just because people read dumb things doesn't mean they are dumb themselves.
- Abishek_Muthian 5y agoI didn't say that, My statement was regarding technical nature of user's interest. I'm genuinely curious about Buzzfeed's rationale to build a factual news site when their brand represented anything but that i.e. 'Going against what their recommendation engine would typically suggest for their users'.
- Talanes 5y agoBecause youth culture loves to exist in dichotomy. The stupid clickbait site and the proper news sight being part of the same thing is the appeal. Similar reasoning to how comedy/news has become a booming format. Doing something stupid and doing something serious at the same time is the zeitgeist.
- Abishek_Muthian 5y agoThat's very interesting, If true then the recommendation engine would have indeed identified the supposed dichotomy thereby justifying the decision to stick with their brand.
- kortilla 5y agoIt does generally mean they are interested in dumb things though. The demographics of people who read those are quite a bit different than those who read long form content.