4 ms·
> knowing you will get support if you lose your job, get cared for if you get sick and when you get old, have an education that is not financially elitist, make
by chrisseaton 5y ago
> knowing you will get support if you lose your job, get cared for if you get sick and when you get old, have an education that is not financially elitist, make enough to live -modestly- and feed your family on a single job
But North American companies also outperform on this.
My health insurance is better than a local company. My sick coverage is better than a local company. My educational opportunities are better than with a local company. My ability to support my family are better than a local company. Even my time off is better than a local company!
- passerby1 5y ago> feed your family on a single job I think it's expected that both family partners work, at least in Sweden. Otherwise it's very tight economically, unless one has some rich inheritance
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- yoz-y 5y agoBeware of the survivorship bias. North American companies operating in the EU are those that are the most successful even in US. You would have a better everything working there compared to elsewhere disregarding of the locality. The advantage is really in working for a rich company.
- JumpCrisscross 5y ago> advantage is really in working for a rich company Of which America has more. For structural reasons. Per the article.
- michael1999 5y agoThe main structural reason being a unified market of 400 million people with the same language, currency, and transportation infrastructure.
- chrisseaton 5y ago> The advantage is really in working for a rich company. Which you don’t get in Europe… which was the point.