4 ms·
I wouldn't pooh pooh that. It's a tough problem for politicians, teachers, education activists and researchers. If you set high standards and allowed only thos
by TheTrotters 5y ago
I wouldn't pooh pooh that. It's a tough problem for politicians, teachers, education activists and researchers.
If you set high standards and allowed only those who pass them to advance to the next grade, graduate HS etc. then you'd end up with clear racial disparities.
I don't want to get into a discussion about what's the cause of these disparities and who's fault they are. But, based on available data on e.g. SAT scores, we'd have Asian Americans doing the best, followed by whites, and with blacks at the bottom.
It'd provoke a flurry of media debate and negative attention on everyone involved. These people cannot fix the problem itself, at least not fully and certainly not quickly. But they can change standards to make it look like everyone is doing well. After all if you lower standards enough everyone will meet them.
It's a real problem and these incentives aren't going to change. Any solution will have to acknowledge and address them, not pretend that they don't exist and that incompetent or weak-minded politicians are to blame.
- ihsw 5y agoSelf-selection has already lead to increased racial segregation, Asian and white students are already increasingly being put into private or charter schools. If we want to improve academic performance of students in predominantly black neighborhoods then we should aggressively remove disruptive students from classrooms regardless of race. An entire classroom is held back by a handful of students intent on raising hell and it does more harm towards ambitious young black boys and girls than any policies intent on solving "disparities." Disparities in outcome is not evidence of discrimination.