Somewhat miss-labeled title.. 1. No antitrust officials are probing the sale as of yet..one just got a letter of protest.. 2. No discussion of the details of

Somewhat miss-labeled title.. 1. No antitrust officials are probing the sale as of yet..one just got a letter of protest.. 2. No discussion of the details of split of the 'rewards'...other better articles have detailed what the split might be as far as what patents go to which group in the consortium .. 3. Bankruptcy court was in Canada which means any anti-trust action is by the EU and yet no details..and yet better other articles have detailed that the EU is in fact reviewing the sale. So what does this article offer? Lazy