3 ms·
I both agree and don't at the same time. On one hand, there shouldn't be anything shameful about living "at home", especially if it's purposeful. (looking back
by ravenstine 5y ago
I both agree and don't at the same time.
On one hand, there shouldn't be anything shameful about living "at home", especially if it's purposeful. (looking back, it probably would have made sense to stay with my folks even longer than I did in order to save more money)
Yet living at home and not building anything into late adulthood tends not to be a good way to generate intergenerational wealth. Until the international economic paradigm changes, I can't see how it's a good thing for people to have nothing to pass on to their children.
- BeFlatXIII 5y agoHow many of these people will make the children on to whom they pass nothing?