3 ms·
I think the response to your claims about who you are is likely to be because it’s neither verifiable, nor relevant to your arguments here. It’s what you are s
by zepto 5y ago
I think the response to your claims about who you are is likely to be because it’s neither verifiable, nor relevant to your arguments here. It’s what you are saying that people are responding to. Not your nationality.
> I asked this extremely aggressive zepto person
I’m curious if you can quote anything in support of your description of me as ‘aggressive’.
Also, you have made it clear that you are an activist who is against many US actions, but what makes you think anyone here is “anti-China?’”.
Most people in the thread seem to regard both the criticisms of the US and, the China’s oppression of the Uighurs as credible.
- xtian 5y agoIt’s seemed pretty relevant to a lot of people in this thread. Your general tone is aggressive. I’m curious if you can quote anywhere where I’ve made it clear I’m an activist. That’s not how I think of myself. I’m posting on a computer programmer forum. The kinds of claims you consider normal about China are in fact anti-China to anyone who’s bothered to learn a little bit about their system and how people there feel about it.
- zepto 5y ago> Your general tone is aggressive. Can you quote something I have written with an aggressive tone? >> I’m curious if you can quote anywhere where I’ve made it clear I’m an activist. Here’s a quote: “Why do I need to say something bad about China? I’m a US citizen. That’s the only country I have any chance of impacting through criticism.” And another: “My only aim is to dissent against the manufacturing of consent for another bloody US war. What’s yours?” You have an acknowledged political agenda behind your comments here.