What we have here is the textbook example of why we don't see many science articles getting voted up on news.yc. - Linkbait-flavored, exaggerated, inaccurate h

What we have here is the textbook example of why we don't see many science articles getting voted up on news.yc. - Linkbait-flavored, exaggerated, inaccurate headline stolen from Harry Potter. - Results presented out of context. How significant an advance is this? What exactly can I do with it? Who else is working on it? - Lame, vague description of technology at a level that wouldn't satisfy a curious fourth grader. - Reference (but no link) to papers in subscription-only journals that nobody can afford. What a waste of five minutes.